Talk:Humiliatrix
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
Interesdom (Talk | contribs) (Merge?) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Doesn't make too much sense to me, but it's directly copied from Wikipedia article... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 05:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | :Doesn't make too much sense to me, but it's directly copied from Wikipedia article... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 05:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I guess the implication is supposed to be that the more likely it is to be illegal, the more taboo it is, therefore the more humiliating. Several leaps of assumption and it's just a guess. --[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 09:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Merge?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm not sure that there is anything here that doesn't belong in either [[Dominatrix]], [[Humiliation]], [[Foot fetishism]] or [[Cuckold]]. On the other hand, I suppose it ''is'' a terminolgy that needs explaining (at least, I assume it is, I've never heard of it). --[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 09:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:26, 19 February 2007
Can anyone explain this bit? "Such practices border on criminal conduct in less libertarian societies, thus they are normally carried on in outdoor locations, like pedestrian malls, as opposed to indoor locations." If it's illegal or nearly so, why do it in public? Is that in the original Wikipedia article? And do we need a Wikipedia link?--Taxwoman 21:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't make too much sense to me, but it's directly copied from Wikipedia article... AnonMoos 05:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- I guess the implication is supposed to be that the more likely it is to be illegal, the more taboo it is, therefore the more humiliating. Several leaps of assumption and it's just a guess. --Interesdom 09:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Merge?
I'm not sure that there is anything here that doesn't belong in either Dominatrix, Humiliation, Foot fetishism or Cuckold. On the other hand, I suppose it is a terminolgy that needs explaining (at least, I assume it is, I've never heard of it). --Interesdom 09:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
