Wipipedia.org talk:Community Portal
Kosmetès (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==Technical flaw== | ==Technical flaw== | ||
I repeatedly found that the Search/Go functions did NOT contain the clickable link to start creating an article (just some coe, probably with a small but critical error in it), while that is still possible if one first creates a 'red link' in an existing article, so the actual creation routine must still be valid - probably a small task for an expert, but greatly needed! [[User:Kosmetès|Kosmetès]] 19:17:50, 2005-11-20 (GMT) | I repeatedly found that the Search/Go functions did NOT contain the clickable link to start creating an article (just some coe, probably with a small but critical error in it), while that is still possible if one first creates a 'red link' in an existing article, so the actual creation routine must still be valid - probably a small task for an expert, but greatly needed! [[User:Kosmetès|Kosmetès]] 19:17:50, 2005-11-20 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for pointiong that out. We upgraded to a new version of the software recently, there must still be some bugs to iron out! [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 23:12, 20 November 2005 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 20 November 2005
Contents |
Copyright
Does anyone know enough to complete the Copyright page? (BTW for some reason it has more links to it than show up on the "What links here" page.) I'm sure I could fathom out the content myself but suspect that someone else can do it with a lot less effort.
--Interesdom 14:17, 2 May 2005 (BST)
Non-consensuality vs BDSM
With all the publicity around about forced-labour and forced prostitution etc. I have little doubt that some people looking for links about nonconsensual slavery will end up on this site. It occurs to me that we should have a page on it, distancing this site and BDSM generally and pointing to other sites such as the BBC (I have the link somewhere) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery etc.
What does anyone else reckon and does anyone want to start it? I'm not sure what title for the topic would be best.
--Interesdom 18:08, 11 May 2005 (BST)
Topic Labels - abbreviations or not?
Please see Talk:Safe, sane, and consensual for proposals I have in this area. --Interesdom 19:10, 28 May 2005 (BST)
Topic Labels - Singular or plural
We currently have a mixture. What is the 'correct' ruling for this? Cane, Dildo and Paddle but Blindfolds, Spreader bars and Violet wands. I can understand some things remaining 'plural' even if we have singular - Handcuffs for example because we don't use 'handcuff' as a noun. Similarly, if we go plural, some things will make easier reading in the singular, such as St Andrews cross. Nevertheless, I think it would make easier navigating and linking if we were consistent.
Again, much easier if we sort this out now rather than wait until there's many more links. Any ideas?
--Interesdom 16:51, 20 Jun 2005 (BST)
I try (most of the time) to use the singular. Balzac 17:19, 20 Jun 2005 (BST)
Technical flaw
I repeatedly found that the Search/Go functions did NOT contain the clickable link to start creating an article (just some coe, probably with a small but critical error in it), while that is still possible if one first creates a 'red link' in an existing article, so the actual creation routine must still be valid - probably a small task for an expert, but greatly needed! Kosmetès 19:17:50, 2005-11-20 (GMT)
Thanks for pointiong that out. We upgraded to a new version of the software recently, there must still be some bugs to iron out! Balzac 23:12, 20 November 2005 (GMT)
