Talk:List of abbreviations

From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search


(response)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:Yes, in starting to disintermediate redirects I found the (mis-named) page at [[Abbreviations]]. As that page though has a complete mixture of BDSM-related and internet-related abbreviations it probably makes sense to separate them out to make the lists more meaningful (and therefore useful to visitors). A page titled '''Abbreviations''' would be more like [[wikipedia:Abbreviation]]s. ie about the construction of initialisms and the like, rather than the ''listing'' of relevant ones. --[[User:VampWillow|VampWillow]] 12:31, 21 Jun 2005 (BST)
 
:Yes, in starting to disintermediate redirects I found the (mis-named) page at [[Abbreviations]]. As that page though has a complete mixture of BDSM-related and internet-related abbreviations it probably makes sense to separate them out to make the lists more meaningful (and therefore useful to visitors). A page titled '''Abbreviations''' would be more like [[wikipedia:Abbreviation]]s. ie about the construction of initialisms and the like, rather than the ''listing'' of relevant ones. --[[User:VampWillow|VampWillow]] 12:31, 21 Jun 2005 (BST)
 +
 +
::Not sure I totally agree with the naming issue of Abbreviations - this is not a general encyclopedia so we don't have to follow the precise conventions required of one and wouldn't have thought that an article about what an abbreviation is has a place here (it would just redirect to 'List of abbreviations').  However, I'm not too fussed.
 +
::I ''am'' concerned about having lots of different lists, however and don't see how it helps.  If someone wants to know what a specific abbreviation means, perhaps with link to further information on here. I don't see that it matters that it is one of twenty or one of fifty abbreviations on a page.  If they just want to surf for BDSM or Fetish-related terms, there are the categories.  Furthermore, what we call a "BDSM abbreviation" is very subjective: while something like "B&D" clearly is and "ATSL" probably isn't, "BJ" or "CFS" is not so clear.  There are some on the [[Abbreviations]] page which could, perhaps, be removed but I have to wonder why bother - someone looking for "HOH" isn't going to be bothered about there being "HTH" below or "HNG" above.  I have thought to put extra columns on the Abbreviations table to highlight various categories they fit into (such as BDSM, Fetish, Dating, Communication, Health) but when I sampled a few, I became very confused as to what to put where.  BTW, please don't take this disagreement as any kind of put-off.  Your input here is very welcome and I don't want to put you off from contributing.  --[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 11:45, 28 Jun 2005 (BST)

Latest revision as of 06:45, 28 June 2005

We already have an Abbreviations page. Anything here not on there needs to be merged and this can then be removed (or redirected). --Interesdom 02:57, 21 Jun 2005 (BST)

Yes, in starting to disintermediate redirects I found the (mis-named) page at Abbreviations. As that page though has a complete mixture of BDSM-related and internet-related abbreviations it probably makes sense to separate them out to make the lists more meaningful (and therefore useful to visitors). A page titled Abbreviations would be more like wikipedia:Abbreviations. ie about the construction of initialisms and the like, rather than the listing of relevant ones. --VampWillow 12:31, 21 Jun 2005 (BST)
Not sure I totally agree with the naming issue of Abbreviations - this is not a general encyclopedia so we don't have to follow the precise conventions required of one and wouldn't have thought that an article about what an abbreviation is has a place here (it would just redirect to 'List of abbreviations'). However, I'm not too fussed.
I am concerned about having lots of different lists, however and don't see how it helps. If someone wants to know what a specific abbreviation means, perhaps with link to further information on here. I don't see that it matters that it is one of twenty or one of fifty abbreviations on a page. If they just want to surf for BDSM or Fetish-related terms, there are the categories. Furthermore, what we call a "BDSM abbreviation" is very subjective: while something like "B&D" clearly is and "ATSL" probably isn't, "BJ" or "CFS" is not so clear. There are some on the Abbreviations page which could, perhaps, be removed but I have to wonder why bother - someone looking for "HOH" isn't going to be bothered about there being "HTH" below or "HNG" above. I have thought to put extra columns on the Abbreviations table to highlight various categories they fit into (such as BDSM, Fetish, Dating, Communication, Health) but when I sampled a few, I became very confused as to what to put where. BTW, please don't take this disagreement as any kind of put-off. Your input here is very welcome and I don't want to put you off from contributing. --Interesdom 11:45, 28 Jun 2005 (BST)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools