Talk:How to make love to a car
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
Interesdom (Talk | contribs) (Needs depersonalising.) |
(Agree with Interesdom) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:No doubt, many will find this utterly weird. Then again, some find [[Furry fandom]] utterly weird, and there must be plenty of people out there who would think the same of [[dog play]] or indeed [[bondage]] in general. Be broad-minded, say I. And if it's a leg-pull, it's not bad.--[[User:Taxwoman|Taxwoman]] 18:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | :No doubt, many will find this utterly weird. Then again, some find [[Furry fandom]] utterly weird, and there must be plenty of people out there who would think the same of [[dog play]] or indeed [[bondage]] in general. Be broad-minded, say I. And if it's a leg-pull, it's not bad.--[[User:Taxwoman|Taxwoman]] 18:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| − | :The issue I have with it is that is appears to be a copy of text from someone's personal web site, or something similar. It needs a re-work to de-personalise it (there can be no "I" in the context of an | + | :The issue I have with it is that is appears to be a copy of text from someone's personal web site, or something similar. It needs a re-work to de-personalise it (there can be no "I" in the context of an encylopaedia) and convert it into an encyclopaedic article. Perhaps some (most?) of it needs to be split off to an Advice page? --[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 07:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC) |
| + | Yes, I'd endorse that. It could be a "personal experiences" page.--[[User:Taxwoman|Taxwoman]] 20:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 16 March 2007
Very Odd!! Comments anyone? Balzac 23:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- No doubt, many will find this utterly weird. Then again, some find Furry fandom utterly weird, and there must be plenty of people out there who would think the same of dog play or indeed bondage in general. Be broad-minded, say I. And if it's a leg-pull, it's not bad.--Taxwoman 18:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- The issue I have with it is that is appears to be a copy of text from someone's personal web site, or something similar. It needs a re-work to de-personalise it (there can be no "I" in the context of an encylopaedia) and convert it into an encyclopaedic article. Perhaps some (most?) of it needs to be split off to an Advice page? --Interesdom 07:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I'd endorse that. It could be a "personal experiences" page.--Taxwoman 20:01, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
