User talk:Igorberger
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
Igorberger (Talk | contribs) (→nonexistent vs non-existent vs nonexistant) |
(→nonexistent vs non-existent vs nonexistant: British spelling) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I don't normally change Personal Experiences pages but as I was formatting that one, my spell checker highlighted "nonexistant". It suggests non-existent, so I simply selected that, though I'm inclined to agree in that nonexistent is even more correct. --[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 16:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | I don't normally change Personal Experiences pages but as I was formatting that one, my spell checker highlighted "nonexistant". It suggests non-existent, so I simply selected that, though I'm inclined to agree in that nonexistent is even more correct. --[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 16:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | : Not according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary. We generally use British spelling.--[[User:Taxwoman|Taxwoman]] 20:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
:Sometimes bad format makes new friends and invites company..:) | :Sometimes bad format makes new friends and invites company..:) |
Revision as of 16:28, 4 January 2008
Welcome to Wipipedia. We hope that you enjoy editing here.
If you need any help, please feel free to e-mail me or leave a note on my talk page.--Taxwoman 22:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Interested in Talking
Thank you, Igorberger 23:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- Have a nice day, Igorberger 23:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
nonexistent vs non-existent vs nonexistant
I don't normally change Personal Experiences pages but as I was formatting that one, my spell checker highlighted "nonexistant". It suggests non-existent, so I simply selected that, though I'm inclined to agree in that nonexistent is even more correct. --Interesdom 16:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary. We generally use British spelling.--Taxwoman 20:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sometimes bad format makes new friends and invites company..:)