User talk:Markova

From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search


(Image:Fairy exhibitionist.jpg: Comment)
(Image:Fairy exhibitionist.jpg)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
::If a man wears what is commonly considered women's-only clothing, then he is objectively cross-dressing.  However, "exhibitionist" is a diagnosis of a psychological syndrome, and does not necessarily directly follow just because someone wears a certain type of clothing.  We should leave the psychological  diagnoses to the psychologists when it comes to image titles/captions... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 07:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 
::If a man wears what is commonly considered women's-only clothing, then he is objectively cross-dressing.  However, "exhibitionist" is a diagnosis of a psychological syndrome, and does not necessarily directly follow just because someone wears a certain type of clothing.  We should leave the psychological  diagnoses to the psychologists when it comes to image titles/captions... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 07:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 
::: In everyday English, such as I speak, an exhibitionist is someone who behaves so as to attract attention to him/herself.  There is no reason whatsoever to insist on a narrow technical meaning of the term, a meaning I was not aware of until today.  However, I am changing the photo caption if that makes you happier.--[[User:Markova|Markova]] 11:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 
::: In everyday English, such as I speak, an exhibitionist is someone who behaves so as to attract attention to him/herself.  There is no reason whatsoever to insist on a narrow technical meaning of the term, a meaning I was not aware of until today.  However, I am changing the photo caption if that makes you happier.--[[User:Markova|Markova]] 11:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 +
::::It's really not just me being pedantic about the definitions of words; what is '''much much''' more important is that you don't know whether or not the woman in photograph would object to being publicly labelled as suffering from a psychological syndrome.  If we can avoid this issue by tinkering a little with the wording, then that would be greatly preferable. [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 06:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:35, 21 April 2012

Welcome to Wipipedia; we hope you enjoy this site. Thanks for your contributions. Please feel free to create or edit further pages. If you need any help, please e-mail me or leave a note on my talk page.--Ropeuser 21:41, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Image:Fairy exhibitionist.jpg

It's really best not to label people in image titles or captions like that, unless you know for certain that that person accepts the label (or is a paid model assuming a role who has signed a model release). Do you know for certain that the person in the photo would not object to being labelled an "exhibitionist" on the Internet? AnonMoos 07:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Sigh. next you'll be telling me that I shouldn't label a picture of a man in a tutu as a cross-dresser!--Markova 20:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
If a man wears what is commonly considered women's-only clothing, then he is objectively cross-dressing. However, "exhibitionist" is a diagnosis of a psychological syndrome, and does not necessarily directly follow just because someone wears a certain type of clothing. We should leave the psychological diagnoses to the psychologists when it comes to image titles/captions... AnonMoos 07:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
In everyday English, such as I speak, an exhibitionist is someone who behaves so as to attract attention to him/herself. There is no reason whatsoever to insist on a narrow technical meaning of the term, a meaning I was not aware of until today. However, I am changing the photo caption if that makes you happier.--Markova 11:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
It's really not just me being pedantic about the definitions of words; what is much much more important is that you don't know whether or not the woman in photograph would object to being publicly labelled as suffering from a psychological syndrome. If we can avoid this issue by tinkering a little with the wording, then that would be greatly preferable. AnonMoos 06:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools