Template talk:Clothing

From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search


(Headings)
(Useful?: re:)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Most of this template is net to impossible to read as not enough contrast between your headers, and working links, with your background colour on your table. I suggest you consider changing the back ground colour for the template --<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC,Bradley Hand ITC,Forte;">[[User:Roguebfl|Roguebfl]] <sup>([[User_talk:Roguebfl|talk]])</sup></span> 21:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 
Most of this template is net to impossible to read as not enough contrast between your headers, and working links, with your background colour on your table. I suggest you consider changing the back ground colour for the template --<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC,Bradley Hand ITC,Forte;">[[User:Roguebfl|Roguebfl]] <sup>([[User_talk:Roguebfl|talk]])</sup></span> 21:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 
: I agree. I copied this off another wiki and must admit that I don't know how to change the colours.--[[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 06:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 
: I agree. I copied this off another wiki and must admit that I don't know how to change the colours.--[[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 06:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
:: Ahh ok, I played around with them, the problem is the Link colors for the wiki can't be over written in away the still lest them function (working link, missing link, and visted link) So must be work with. BTW do you wanted it Floated left like that? --<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC,Bradley Hand ITC,Forte;">[[User:Roguebfl|Roguebfl]] <sup>([[User_talk:Roguebfl|talk]])</sup></span> 08:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
+
:: Ahh ok, I played around with them, the problem is the Link colors for the wiki can't be over written in away the still lest them function (working link, missing link, and visited link) So must be work with. BTW do you wanted it Floated left like that? --<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC,Bradley Hand ITC,Forte;">[[User:Roguebfl|Roguebfl]] <sup>([[User_talk:Roguebfl|talk]])</sup></span> 08:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
  
 +
== Useful? ==
  
 
I am still not sure about this, I think the job could be better done with a list. Is it really necessary to categorise every item of clothing into Fetish, bondage and vanilla? I think what would be more useful and easier to maintain would be a link to a list of clothing articles that people can just scroll down and select what they want. we can then include related articles such as care of latex and dress codes etc. [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 16:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 
I am still not sure about this, I think the job could be better done with a list. Is it really necessary to categorise every item of clothing into Fetish, bondage and vanilla? I think what would be more useful and easier to maintain would be a link to a list of clothing articles that people can just scroll down and select what they want. we can then include related articles such as care of latex and dress codes etc. [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 16:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
: I think the point is the point is making the subtopic of clothing more navigable, and not having to copy the entire list every time it is expanded, onto every page, much like [[:wikipedia:Template:BDSM]]
  
 
== Headings ==
 
== Headings ==
  
 
Using <nowiki>== Clothing ==</nowiki> type headings in templates is a bad idea, as the edit link sends to to editing the template, not the page that you clicked on. --<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC,Bradley Hand ITC,Forte;">[[User:Roguebfl|Roguebfl]] <sup>([[User_talk:Roguebfl|talk]])</sup></span> 16:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 
Using <nowiki>== Clothing ==</nowiki> type headings in templates is a bad idea, as the edit link sends to to editing the template, not the page that you clicked on. --<span style="font-family:Kristen ITC,Bradley Hand ITC,Forte;">[[User:Roguebfl|Roguebfl]] <sup>([[User_talk:Roguebfl|talk]])</sup></span> 16:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:58, 26 November 2008

Colours

Most of this template is net to impossible to read as not enough contrast between your headers, and working links, with your background colour on your table. I suggest you consider changing the back ground colour for the template --Roguebfl (talk) 21:30, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree. I copied this off another wiki and must admit that I don't know how to change the colours.--Ropeuser 06:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Ahh ok, I played around with them, the problem is the Link colors for the wiki can't be over written in away the still lest them function (working link, missing link, and visited link) So must be work with. BTW do you wanted it Floated left like that? --Roguebfl (talk) 08:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Useful?

I am still not sure about this, I think the job could be better done with a list. Is it really necessary to categorise every item of clothing into Fetish, bondage and vanilla? I think what would be more useful and easier to maintain would be a link to a list of clothing articles that people can just scroll down and select what they want. we can then include related articles such as care of latex and dress codes etc. Balzac 16:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I think the point is the point is making the subtopic of clothing more navigable, and not having to copy the entire list every time it is expanded, onto every page, much like wikipedia:Template:BDSM

Headings

Using == Clothing == type headings in templates is a bad idea, as the edit link sends to to editing the template, not the page that you clicked on. --Roguebfl (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools