Talk:BDSM

From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search


Line 1: Line 1:
What do people feel about copying the much larger Wikipedia BDSM article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDSM
 
and using that as a starting point for the BDSM entry? It's much more comprehensive and looks pretty accurate to me.
 
  
Tanos says@: "Ok, no objections. So I've copied the Wikipedia BDSM article across. It still needs making more relevant to the UK scene, but I think it's a very good starting point, that a total newcomer could read through to get an overview, without having to follow lots of cross-references to piece everything together."
 
 
Yes, it is a good start but is too much and some sub-sections could end up being in contention with the specific subject page.  I think from now on, we should be trying to trim down the text that is there (making sure the content is in the section page) to make this much more a of quick-read overview, while possibly adding in any missing sub-sections.  I can't think how to trim down the History sub-section: I think it should be pulled out as a new section entirely.  Depending on who gets involved, History could become a big area and might even need a Category.
 
--[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 12:47, 2 Apr 2005 (BST)
 

Revision as of 17:23, 20 April 2007

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Tools